“Furthermore studies show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from a task that is structured as studying.”

Clark Lowery & LumpkinGeneral“Furthermore studies show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from a task that is structured as studying.”

“Furthermore studies show that mental performance operates better after a distraction from a task that is structured as studying.”

Then finish the sentence with “Therefore recreational time from the students’ schedule would have detrimental effects.”

Also, not the greater amount of vocabulary that is specific.

I’m speaking about “schedule”

This is good vocabulary because it is vocabulary only related to education or specially linked to education.

So it shows the examiner I’ve got rich vocabulary.

“Many people say that globalization and the growing wide range of multinational companies have a effect that is negative the environment.”

“to what extent for your requirements agree or disagree.”

“Use specific reasons and examples to support your position.”

So what’s the crooks associated with the question?

“That globalization and multinational companies are damaging environmental surroundings. Having a poor effect.”

So first: Globalization, definitely damaging environmental surroundings.

I possibly could be long. I really could give a lengthy and complex, more answer that is accurate that:

“Globalization is enhancing the cost of world economic resources that will be therefore enhancing the price of substitute products (or rival products) such as for instance ecological energy from wind farms… blah, blah, blah…”

But the examiner doesn’t care. Yeah?

He wants to see just something logical.

So I’m just going to take simple route.

Something that is going to be easy to explain and where I’ve got some good vocabulary.

Let’s go. That is my idea:

“Increased interaction between countries”

“Leads to improve goods and services traded”

“Which means more production”

“Therefore more resource extraction” (such as for example mining)…

Maybe I’ll remove that in my final sentence ’cause then I could just speak about the example, which may be:

“For example, in China (largely considered the workshop of the world), in a lot of cities polluting of the environment masks are required to commute all over city center.”

So therefore, I’ve proved my point. I we do your essay said that globalization is damaging the environmental surroundings.

Plus it’s very easy to follow.

Next, I need to get back to the relevant question’cause I wanted to check on.

The 2nd point was about multinationals.

Once more, I’ve taken the simple route. It says,

“Multinationals have the effect of negative effects into the environment.”

It’s quite a big statement to say that. But I’m just gonna say “yes.”

I’m just likely to say “yes” as it’s simple.

I’m getting points for my language, not for the quality of my ideas.

“Yes, multinationals do increase pollution.”

“Globalization requires solutions that are globalthese can have drastic consequences if accidents happen).”

Needless to say I’m going to expand it a bit that is little that’s the main section of my argument.

It says, “A negative effect in the environment” within the question.

Here, I’ve put “increased pollution” more or less is saying.”

I’ve put “destroyed the ecosystem that is local in my example.

During my example, I speak about:

The Gulf of Mexico

The oil pill (a few years ago)

… destroyed the system that is local.

It proves my point.

And them before, I said “drastic consequences” just another collocation there if you’ve caught.

Once more, be in a solid plan together,

put in down the points,

thinking about an example that will correspond,

then I’ve got 2 paragraphs that are solid.

Now, all i must do is my conclusion and my introduction.

That we can draw through the body paragraphs.

“Parents would you like to achieve balance between family career but only a manage that is few achieve it.”

“What do you believe is the reason?”

“Discuss possible solutions and offer examples.”

Now, we’ve got the problem and a solution that is possible.

Therefore the paragraph that is first be what’s the reasons why there was a challenge looking for the total amount between family and career.

My paragraph that is second will suggest solutions.

This will be significant.

I’ve paid attention into the question and every paragraph will correspond

to the question,

To the right components of the question,

structures of this question,

and for that reason I’m going to get points for Task Response.

Let’s have a look.

“The first reasons why there clearly was an imbalance…”

Notice as well, I used the negative form of the verb.

It says, “It’s hard to achieve a balance,” so I said,“The good reason behind the imbalance…”

“… is really because there’s increased competition when you look at the place of work,”

“changes in society,”

“increase in the quantity of working mothers put pressure on the family…”

As you care able to see, I’ve got quite a few points here. And so I might cut them down and only make use of the ones most highly relevant to my example.

And my example (once again) is totally invented but it’s believable. Here it really is:

“Studies in the United States (US) show that families with two full-time parents are more inclined to separate.”

“Therefore, this shows that finding the balance is incredibly difficult.”

This is the reason. This is exactly what i do believe.

They’re more prone to separate. Full time, a lot of stress, it’s likely to be difficult.

Paragraph two, possible solutions.

Possible solutions. Here, I’ve just gone for something that fitted…

I was included with my example first, after which I was thinking “Okay, I can go with this route.”

First I was thinking of France having a 35-hour working week.

(that will be quite outrageous if you’re from the UK and from the United States to even do that.)

(as a result of the culture that individuals have there in the UK).

So that the solution would be:

Regulations through the government.

Government could legislate for increasing maternity leave.

More working that is flexible.

Reduced week that is working.

For example, “In France, the us government proposed and implemented a 35-hour working week.”

Also, lot of collocations there.

“flexible working practices”

Make use of these. Once you receive in special vocabulary that you’re only planning to find speaing frankly about this topic.

So we’ve done a few questions about globalization, also touching in the environment.

We’ve done a couple of about education.

Now, we’re going to do one about… Well, a differnt one about equality.

“Nowadays both women and men spend a lot of cash on beauty care. This is not too in the past.”

“What could be the real cause for this behavior?”

“Discuss the causes and possible results.”

Now that one was tricky.

This one was tricky in my situation since it’s difficult to acquire the examples about any of it.

Particularly for 2 paragraphs.

Okay, it wasn’t difficult. It was a little more of a challenge and I also have to think more.

Nonetheless it’s important that you will do the thinking process beforehand.

So let’s have a look at paragraph 1.

Before I let you know the answers, try and think of a few ideas yourself.

The greater times you will do this,

the more times you look at a question

and think about examples,

think about arguments,

the easier and simpler it gets.

Especially concerning the examples.

Particularly if you invented the examples.

So my idea was basically marketing.

I’ll provide you with the question again:

“Nowadays both men and women fork out a lot of money on beauty care. This was not very within the past.”

“What could be the real cause for this behavior?”

“Discuss the reasons and possible results.”

My idea for paragraph 1:

Because of this, it’s rather easy to think about examples ’cause our company is subjected to publicity everyday.

Therefore it’s not too difficult.

“The beauty marketplace for women may be worth millions, consumer goods companies see similar potential for the male market.”

Once more, just bullet points.

“Therefore developing ranges that are new e.g. L’Oreal for Men Expert.”

“Therefore the reason is the potential opportunity.”

“The female marketplace for women is worth millions.”

“The male market isn’t developed.”

“Therefore developing the market that is male we’ve practically doubled our sales.”

So let’s take a look at some of the collocations.

“consumer goods companies”

And I may also say, “Consumer goods companies such as L’Oreal, Proctor and Gamble, Johnson and Johnson…”

“see the potential for male market”

For instance, L’Oreal developed an expert.

If I put up every one of these ideas together in one single cohesive paragraph…

And in case you should know simple tips to write a paragraph that is cohesive have a look at the sentence guide at

For the reason that it provides you with just a really simple formula to use to drop your thinking in and presto.

Add Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *